A taste of “Criminal Opera (presently being written)” by Doug McPheters:
“Spurred by the widespread revulsion at the many evils committed by the defeated Nazis during World War II, the four Allied victors organized a series of 13 trials in Nuremberg, Germany between 1945 and 1949. They were designed to deal with heinous offenses committed by Nazi officials, important Germans, and their colleagues. The issues involved there were complicated and deep. The process was intended to yield long-lasting remedies, beyond the executions and prison sentences imposed. In all, 199 defendants were tried, 161 were convicted and sent to prison while 37 were sentenced to death.
Thought to be foremost at the time was the requirement that fully informed and voluntary consent, without force, fraud, or deceit, would be required before subjecting anyone to any medical procedure. The voluntary and informed consent of human subjects was and remains absolutely essential to date.
Similar trials have continued for decades including recent trials of elderly defendants who only held minor administrative positions in some of the Nazi regime’s concentration camps, resulting in some convictions and jail sentences. This followed many cases where offenders were living in America and were extradited to Germany and other parts of Europe for trial. After his 2020 trial, Friedrich Karl Berger, then 94, told the Washington Post that much of the case was based on “lies,” saying, “I was 19 years old. I was ordered to go there.” He also said he was only at the camp for a short time and denied carrying a weapon. “After 75 years, this is ridiculous. I cannot believe it,” he said. “I cannot understand how this can happen in a country like this. You’re forcing me out of my home.” Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson said in a statement that Berger’s deportation “demonstrates the Department of Justice’s and its law enforcement partners’ commitment to ensuring that the United States is not a safe haven for those who have participated in Nazi crimes against humanity and other human rights abuses.” David Garvey believes these recent events demonstrate the continued applicability of the Nűremberg Codex, even if not specifically related to World War II.
To him, these extraditions and trials were vibrant evidence of the continuing effectiveness and strength of the Nuremberg rules – their validity did not end when the original Nuremberg trials were completed. In the view of David and many others, the punishments provided for in those rules are applicable to those who organized and implemented the “Covid” plandemic and the resulting deaths and lingering health damage.
How then did we arrive in the 21st Century or perhaps earlier where unproven drugs were given to people under government mandate, without the informed or voluntary consent of the recipients? This has led to serious talk of Nuremberg 2.0, a process to punish those guilty for the “Covid” plandemic and the evils perpetrated on gullible and unsuspecting uninformed people worldwide. Plus, guilty people must be held accountable for the vast sums paid to healthcare professionals and medical organizations by government organizations for catering to ineffective mandate requirements, in many cases eagerly funded by the pharmaceutical industry.”
